Entries in launch (3)

Wednesday
Jun152011

Alfa's Launch Strategy Leaked: 4C to lead off full US lineup

Whether leaked intentionally or not, this chart detailing Alfa's next few years of product planning tells an interesting story.  Much to my relief, the current (mediocre) MiTo will not be the car that Alfa returns to the US with, nor will the (decent) Giulietta be the launch vehicle. Instead the first car to come here will be a production version of the mid-engined 4C show car.  Now I particularly detested the design of that show car but I think it will do a good job of creating the proper sporting halo for the brand as it is re-launched stateside. Since most Americans old enough to remember Alfa associate the marque with the Spider, I think it's important for a small, fun sports car to be the emotional center of the lineup.  It seems that Alfa is planning a full line of vehicles, including a hatchback (facelifted MiTo) as well as a sedan and wagon (replacing the drop-dead-gorgeous 159), plus a small SUV.  Later the Giulietta will be updated and launched here.  I strongly disagree with the SUV component of this mix, but it seems like an inevitablility at this point that every brand in the US market needs to have one.

One more thought: It seems apparent that the Alfa folks intend to use the Giulia and Giulietta names here for the planned sedan, wagon, and hatchback, but although those names have huge resonance for me as an Alfista, it seems they haven't realized that Americans have no idea how to pronounce those names (Julia and Julietta, not Geela and Geeletta, dammit!). I think Alfa should stick to a 159-style numbering system for the sedans, and 4C, 8C style system for the sporting models.

Via the Alfa BB

Monday
Nov222010

FIAT - Floundering Italian Advertising Talent?

I just caught an eyeful of the supposed "first new FIAT commercial" aimed at the US Market, via jalopnik. And folks, I almost lost that Tiramisu I had for dessert.  Porca Miseria!

FIAT has two monumental challenges in re-entering the American market. Not only must it overcome the fears of notorious Italian unreliability and indifferent service it engendered in older consumers 30 years ago, but it must essentially launch a NEW BRAND for the majority of their target entry-level buyer segment, who are too young and too car-ignorant to have ever known what a FIAT was in the first place. And if this ad is any indication of what they are bringing to the table, Sergio Marchionne may as well stay soakin' in that hottub with Berlusconi until they cook up something sexier.

If have rarely seen such bland, meaningless stock imagery combined with such artless cinematography of the actual car. The first shot where we actually see the product (after 35 nauseating seconds!), the car drives over a distracting manhole cover in the road. Couldn't they have chosen a different snippet of footage to start off with?? Combine this with the computer generated "flower-petal" imagery (at 0:41 and 0:52) which is blatantly yanked from the original VW beetle and iMac campaigns from c.1999, and seems utterly out of place in this commercial. 

The messaging touts the car as an expression of the "Italian Way" yet we never are shown the original car or how pervasive and loved it is throughout Italy. No, instead we are subjected to cloying imagery of an archetypal Italian Grandma kissing a child, and fields of olive trees. The only reference to FIAT's history is the parade of badges towards the end, which will bewilder most Americans (who, as I said, have no real idea what a FIAT is) and only emphasizes the fickle nature of the company's branding over the years.

In the end, I am left trying to take stock of what I am supposed to come away with.  Where is the "Zoom Zoom" or the "Let's Motor"?  "Life is Best when Driven" probably sounded cool in Italian (I have a strong suspicion this ad was done by an Italian agency because the cheese factor reeks distinctively of Parmeggiano) but in English it just sits there in all its inglorious passive voice.

I could rant like this for hours, but I think i'll shut up and let you watch it already!

La Dolce Vita, it ain't!

And the music was awful too, wasn't it? But at least they didn't use Opera...

Friday
Oct012010

Lotus Blossoms in Paris, but what would Colin Think??

Lotus pulled a PR coup at the Paris Auto Show this week with a stunning unveiling of 5 entirely new models! All this with no warning to the press or months of hype preceding it. First, I gotta give a hat tip to their PR folks, because that was such a refreshing return to the old days when an unveiling really was an unveiling! 

As a lifelong fan of this unique British marque, I am pleased to see a robust set of brand new offerings from them. Although Lotus was historically mainly a maker of small volume sports cars, founder Colin Chapman definitely sought to offer a full line of sports and GT cars, but never quite managed to acheive that goal before his untimely death. His devotion to and fixation upon motor racing was a huge distraction from his production cars and they were always short on capital, so there has never been a time in the history of the company when they have had a well-coordinated line of brand new offerings all at once like this. In that respect, I think Colin would be proud of this launch.

Also, none of these cars is ugly, let me say. I happen to think each on is quite nice by itself, though the Elise is a disappointment. The proportions are all good, and there are some really cool idiosyncratic details that belong on a Lotus, like the strange tail light treatment on the Eterne, for example.  The Elan and the Esprit have the cleanest, most purposeful look, but the Eterne and Elite have some very nice GT proportions as well.  There is a good "family look" to the line, but I have to admit that they all look almost too similar. I have a hard time telling the differnce between the Eterne and the Elite front views, for example.  Furthermore, all of these cars look less like Loti to me than what a frustrated Hyundai designer might draw at home in his spare time, wishing his boss would listen to him.  There is something unmistakably Asian about these cars, and they definitely fall into some of the same form and surfacing tricks employed at Toyota and Honda of late.

Yet for those critical of the styling, what should Lotus' new owners have done? Lotus has always been a forward looking company, and any retro touches would have been totally inappropriate. (The L  O  T  U  S  lettering on the trunk lid of the Elite and Eterne is a wonderful subtle nod to the Europa, though!) Furthermore, there has never been a singular Lotus look. With few exceptions, every Lotus road car has had a fairly individual look and style to it.  Lotus under Colin Chapman was always innovative mechanically, but styling-wise followed whatever the prevailing aesthetic current of the time was.  The original Seven, Elite, Elan, and Esprit look nothing like each other, but each epitomizes the look of the time in which it was designed.  In other words, there is no telltale family gene to draw upon, even in the slightest.

The only commonality amongst all the original cars was the ingenuity of Colin Chapman's brilliant chassis design, clever use of advanced materials, and the adherence to his "Add Lightness" philosophy.  Even most of the recent post-Chapman Loti such as the Elise and Exige have adhered piously to the way Colin thought about sports cars.  This is the point where I might say that the new company has now diverged from its founder's vision.  These new cars offer little in the way of unique technical design. Surely they will perform to a high level, but at about twice the curb weight and twice the horsepower that Colin would have deemed necessary, and without any unusual or even bizarre tricks that Colin tried. I suppose the need to become a full-line volume manufacturer causes some compromises, but Colin Chapman was rarely if ever one to compromise his engineering philosophy. What do you all think? Would Colin approve??

Photos via Autoblog